NEWS

Fertilization trial in coffee: Soluble NPK replaces granular NPK in half the dose

The following is a selection of scientific research demonstrating the effect of nutrients and nutritional imbalances on coffee yield and quality, as well as the importance of choosing the appropriate specialty plant nutrition (SPN) products.

April 25, 2018

The following is a selection of scientific research demonstrating the effect of nutrients and nutritional imbalances on coffee yield and quality, as well as the importance of choosing the appropriate specialty plant nutrition (SPN) products.

With the aim of evaluating the response of coffee crops to the application of different sources of NPK fertilizers, both granular and soluble, in reduced doses, a field trial was conducted at the Hamburgo Coffee Farm, located in Tapachula, Chiapas, Mexico.

Trial Design: Catuai coffee with reduced NPK doses

The research focused on the Catuai variety, stumped in 2009, with a density of 3,600 plants per hectare.

The study aimed to measure coffee crop yields under different fertilization strategies, focusing on the efficient use of nutrients.

Treatment Structure

The treatments evaluated included different sources of NPK, both granular and soluble, and were applied in split doses, at two key moments in the crop cycle.

Treatment Formula Fertilizer type Dose N-total N-NO3 N-NH4 N-NH3 P2O5 K2O CaO MgO
Kg/há Kg/há Source Kg/há
T1 22-6-21+2%CaO+2%MgO Granular 251 55 6 49 15 52 KCl 6 6
T2 19-5-18+2%CaO+2%MgO 291 55 30 25 15 52 KNO3 6 6
T3 18-5-17+2%CaO+2%MgO Water soluble 306 55 30 25 15 52 Ultrasol® NKS 6 6
T4 (75%*T3) 18-5-17+2%CaO+2%MgO 230 41 23 19 12 39 Ultrasol® NKS 5 5
T5 (50%*T3) 18-5-17+2%CaO+2%MgO 153 28 15 12 8 26 Ultrasol® NKS 3 3

Cuadro 1. Los tratamientos NPK.

The treatments were applied manually in accordance with the farm’s standard practice. Treatments T1 and T2 were applied with granular fertilizers (Fig. 1), while T3, T4 and T5 with water-soluble fertilizers (Fig. 2).

The fertilization variants under study comprised 5 treatments that were arranged in a completely randomized design with 10 replicates each. The experimental unit was the plant. Three manual harvests were conducted: the first on November 18th, 2011, the second on December 19th, 2011, and the third on January 18th, 2012.

Agronomic analysis and conclusions

The fruit yield for each treatment (Fig. 3) was analyzed using analysis of variance and the differences between the means, using the LSD test.

Only a significant difference (P = 0.05) was found between treatments T3 and T5. Nevertheless, it should be noted that T5 achieved the highest yield, considering that only 50% of the N-P-K-Ca and Mg units were applied, whereas in T1, T2, and T3, 100% were applied.

Additionally, it should be highlighted that T3 was severely affected by the disease “ojo de gallo” (Mycena citricolor), which reduced T3’s yield.

Related newsSee all news →

NEWS | December 18, 2023
Alfalfa Production Center in La Tirana receives national award from UN Global Compact
Read more →
NEWS | September 7, 2023
UCN IPP Seminar analyzed impact of lithium policy in the Antofagasta Region
Read more →
NEWS | June 13, 2023
SQM Lithium Ventures presented the first generation of entrepreneurs within the corporate acceleration program
Read more →